Charles River Laboratories vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: CDMO Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of Charles River Laboratories and Thermo Fisher Scientific on independent FDA inspections, EMA and MHRA GMP certificates, clinical-program activity, and CDMO Signal Score. Data sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Newbury Park, CA · Memphis, TN · Keele, UK · Rockville, MD
Signal Score
92/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
99/100
FDA inspections
7
— NAI / VAI / OAI
4 / 3 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
9
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
2
Clinical programs (matched)
0
Capacity
Limited
Modalities
CAR-T, Cell Therapy, Gene Editing, Plasmid, AAV, Lentiviral
Plainville, MA · Alachua, FL · Cambridge, MA
Signal Score
83/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
98/100
FDA inspections
4
— NAI / VAI / OAI
1 / 3 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
1
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
9
Clinical programs (matched)
2
Capacity
Available
Modalities
AAV, Lentiviral, Plasmid DNA, Adenoviral
Evaluating Charles River Laboratories and Thermo Fisher Scientific for a program?
Use the free AI matchmaker to weigh both against your specific requirements — capacity, modality, regulatory record, geography — and surface other qualified options.
Find & compare CDMOs →
Sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.