AGC Biologics vs Lonza: CDMO Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of AGC Biologics and Lonza on independent FDA inspections, EMA and MHRA GMP certificates, clinical-program activity, and CDMO Signal Score. Data sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

AGC Biologics → 80.6
Longmont, CO · Milan, IT · Copenhagen, DK · Chiba, JP
Signal Score
81/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
100/100
FDA inspections
1
— NAI / VAI / OAI
0 / 1 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
22
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
0
Clinical programs (matched)
2
Capacity
Available
Modalities
CAR-T, Cell Therapy, AAV, Lentiviral
Lonza → 78.2
Basel, Switzerland
Signal Score
78/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
95/100
FDA inspections
2
— NAI / VAI / OAI
0 / 2 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
3
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
5
Clinical programs (matched)
1
Capacity
—
Modalities
AAV, Lentiviral, Cell Therapy, mRNA
How we score CDMOs →  ·  Compare other CDMOs →
Evaluating AGC Biologics and Lonza for a program?
Use the free AI matchmaker to weigh both against your specific requirements — capacity, modality, regulatory record, geography — and surface other qualified options.
Find & compare CDMOs →
Sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.