Lonza vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: CDMO Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Lonza and Thermo Fisher Scientific on independent FDA inspections, EMA and MHRA GMP certificates, clinical-program activity, and CDMO Signal Score. Data sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Lonza → 78.2
Basel, Switzerland
Signal Score
78/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
95/100
FDA inspections
2
— NAI / VAI / OAI
0 / 2 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
3
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
5
Clinical programs (matched)
1
Capacity
—
Modalities
AAV, Lentiviral, Cell Therapy, mRNA
Thermo Fisher Scientific → 83.1
Plainville, MA · Alachua, FL · Cambridge, MA
Signal Score
83/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
98/100
FDA inspections
4
— NAI / VAI / OAI
1 / 3 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
1
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
9
Clinical programs (matched)
2
Capacity
Available
Modalities
AAV, Lentiviral, Plasmid DNA, Adenoviral
How we score CDMOs →  ·  Compare other CDMOs →
Evaluating Lonza and Thermo Fisher Scientific for a program?
Use the free AI matchmaker to weigh both against your specific requirements — capacity, modality, regulatory record, geography — and surface other qualified options.
Find & compare CDMOs →
Sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.