Charles River Laboratories vs Oxford Biomedica: CDMO Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Charles River Laboratories and Oxford Biomedica on independent FDA inspections, EMA and MHRA GMP certificates, clinical-program activity, and CDMO Signal Score. Data sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Charles River Laboratories → 91.7
Newbury Park, CA · Memphis, TN · Keele, UK · Rockville, MD
Signal Score
92/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
99/100
FDA inspections
7
— NAI / VAI / OAI
4 / 3 / 0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
9
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
2
Clinical programs (matched)
0
Capacity
Limited
Modalities
CAR-T, Cell Therapy, Gene Editing, Plasmid, AAV, Lentiviral
Oxford Biomedica → 77.1
Oxford, United Kingdom
Signal Score
77/100
Quality (FDA + GMP)
100/100
FDA inspections
0
FDA warning letters
0
EMA GMP certificates (active)
3
MHRA GMP certificates (compliant)
10
Clinical programs (matched)
7
Capacity
Available
Modalities
Lentiviral, AAV
How we score CDMOs →  ·  Compare other CDMOs →
Evaluating Charles River Laboratories and Oxford Biomedica for a program?
Use the free AI matchmaker to weigh both against your specific requirements — capacity, modality, regulatory record, geography — and surface other qualified options.
Find & compare CDMOs →
Sourced from FDA, EMA EudraGMDP, MHRA GMDP, and ClinicalTrials.gov.